Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 00:54
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What might be the social consequences of an ethnic as opposed to a civic conception of the nation?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
"D Gukesh Was Blindly...": Magnus Carlsen's First Reaction After Loss To Indian GM - NDTV Sports
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What is the best sunscreen for oily skin without a white cast?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Why do many Hong Kong Chinese look different from the Han Chinese in mainland China?
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Are there any industries or sectors where ChatGPT is particularly well-suited for implementation?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
What's the most incredible coincidence that ever happened to you?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
"People don't even like him": Musk becomes GOP pariah after "ridiculous" Trump attacks - Axios